We were told that the Anti-smacking law would do something to stop child abuse. However this is not the case with child abuse rates staying constant since the law was passed.
The Yes vote lobby then goes and tells us that the law is working because parents aren't being prosecuted for a light smack.
Thus this logo.
My question is then, how come they base there view on whether or not the law is working on the amount of good parents who are being prosecuted, when the law was apparently passed to stop child abuse?
Maybe this should really be there logo.
Sounds like a FAIL to me